<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atelopus Frog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itsnature.org/ground/amphibians-land/atelopus-frog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itsnature.org/ground/amphibians-land/atelopus-frog/</link>
	<description>Its nature offers you interesting information and facts on the natural world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:01:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.itsnature.org/ground/amphibians-land/atelopus-frog/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 23:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsnature.org/ground/amphibians-land/atelopus-frog/#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>everything that caused the demise of the frog was caused by global warming?  And he used to live in elevations between 6 and 2000 meters elevation?  And you say he lives by a stream on a  coastal range now?  Is that a higher or lower elevation then where he used to live?  

If it is lower, then he has moved to WARMER elevations.  This would make your &quot;global warming&quot; hypothesis invalid.  If is is higher, there may (I repeat MAY) be some validity to the gloal warming hypothesis, but I think it is irresponsible to lump this animal&#039;s demise to global warming.  He just may taste good to the locals.

Hot air like these articles contribute to global warming more than does sunshine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everything that caused the demise of the frog was caused by global warming?  And he used to live in elevations between 6 and 2000 meters elevation?  And you say he lives by a stream on a  coastal range now?  Is that a higher or lower elevation then where he used to live?  </p>
<p>If it is lower, then he has moved to WARMER elevations.  This would make your &#8220;global warming&#8221; hypothesis invalid.  If is is higher, there may (I repeat MAY) be some validity to the gloal warming hypothesis, but I think it is irresponsible to lump this animal&#8217;s demise to global warming.  He just may taste good to the locals.</p>
<p>Hot air like these articles contribute to global warming more than does sunshine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
