<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Stonehenge</title> <atom:link href="http://www.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/</link> <description>Its nature offers you interesting information and facts on the natural world</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Location Villa Italie</title><link>http://www.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/#comment-8379</link> <dc:creator>Location Villa Italie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/#comment-8379</guid> <description>The traffic-choked roads still roaring past Stonehenge in Wiltshire have earned the world&#039;s most famous prehistoric monument a place on a list of the world&#039;s most threatened sites.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The traffic-choked roads still roaring past Stonehenge in Wiltshire have earned the world&#8217;s most famous prehistoric monument a place on a list of the world&#8217;s most threatened sites.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Car Hire UK</title><link>http://www.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/#comment-8024</link> <dc:creator>Car Hire UK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 06:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/#comment-8024</guid> <description>Thanks for sharing! Stonehenge is fascinating!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing! Stonehenge is fascinating!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robbi</title><link>http://www.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/#comment-48</link> <dc:creator>Robbi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:14:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/#comment-48</guid> <description>I think personally that the intellectual snob might consider it hype. I personally consider that its a real testament to what men can do with no tools... since it is made of natural materials, I&#039;d simplify it a bit and call it a natural wonder.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think personally that the intellectual snob might consider it hype. I personally consider that its a real testament to what men can do with no tools&#8230; since it is made of natural materials, I&#8217;d simplify it a bit and call it a natural wonder.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BRAXTON KRABBE</title><link>http://www.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/#comment-47</link> <dc:creator>BRAXTON KRABBE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/#comment-47</guid> <description>Greetings. Glad that this query is made. I think Stonehenge is hyped. Being man-made, it cannot, and should not, qualify as a &quot;natural&quot; wonder because it came about through human intervention.There should be a Classification of the &quot;Wonders&quot; stuff -- that is, Man-made and Natural. The latter presupposes that it came into being free from human intervention.Present day equipment can make a stuff similar to a stonehenge. Really, when I first came to see this stonehenge photos and marketing hype calling it a natural wonder, I thought that those people to elevated the category to a world-class &quot;wonder&quot; did not understand what it meant. Have you been to the EL NIDO of Palawan, Philippines? That, IS a Natural Wonder!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings. Glad that this query is made. I think Stonehenge is hyped. Being man-made, it cannot, and should not, qualify as a &#8220;natural&#8221; wonder because it came about through human intervention.</p><p>There should be a Classification of the &#8220;Wonders&#8221; stuff &#8212; that is, Man-made and Natural. The latter presupposes that it came into being free from human intervention.</p><p>Present day equipment can make a stuff similar to a stonehenge. Really, when I first came to see this stonehenge photos and marketing hype calling it a natural wonder, I thought that those people to elevated the category to a world-class &#8220;wonder&#8221; did not understand what it meant. Have you been to the EL NIDO of Palawan, Philippines? That, IS a Natural Wonder!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nathan</title><link>http://www.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/#comment-46</link> <dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:12:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.itsnature.org/natural-wonders/stonehenge/#comment-46</guid> <description>Nathan Do you think Stonehenge really classifies as a natural wonder? Being man-made and everything?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan<br /> Do you think Stonehenge really classifies as a natural wonder? Being man-made and everything?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 399/408 objects using memcached

Served from: www.itsnature.org @ 2012-02-08 15:49:55 -->
